Richard Naimy

Understanding Claude Skills vs MCP and Why It Matters for AI Strategy

Most people see Claude’s new Skills tool as a simple way to “train” the model. But the real story behind Claude Skills vs MCP is how it changes where intelligence lives inside your organization.

The fundamental shift isn’t about teaching an AI to perform one more trick. The transformation centers on how intelligence gets deployed across an organization.

Claude Skills doesn’t compete with OpenAI’s Model Context Protocol (MCP). It moves past it. MCP was about connecting models to tools. Skills are about giving models capabilities: modular, reusable, and context-aware.

The shift changes everything about how businesses build, scale, and govern AI.

What Leaders Get Wrong About AI Tools

Many teams still see large language models as static assistants, not dynamic systems. They prompt. They wait. They move on.

MCP began to fix that by creating a structure. It provided developers with a framework for integrating APIs and extending the model context. But MCP was still technical at its core, built for engineers, not operators.

Claude Skills flips the hierarchy. Now, non-technical users can define how a model performs a task once, save that behavior as a Skill, and reuse it across conversations, projects, or tools.

The common mistake is treating Skills like plugins or saved prompts. They’re not shortcuts. They’re capability modules, small, composable pieces of intelligence that make workflows more adaptive and consistent.

Understanding MCP: The Foundation That Wasn’t Enough

Before we go further, let’s talk about what Model Context Protocol actually is, because if you’re not a developer, the name alone probably made your eyes glaze over.

MCP standardizes how models call tools and data sources. It defines connectors so your model can read from systems like Salesforce or trigger actions in Slack.

Developers loved MCP because it solved a real problem. Before MCP, every time you wanted your AI to interact with a new tool or database, you had to write custom integration code. MCP standardized that process. Want your model to pull data from Salesforce? There’s an MCP connector for that. Need it to trigger a Slack notification? MCP handles it.

But here’s the thing: MCP only solved half the problem. It connected the pipes, but it didn’t teach the model how to use those pipes effectively. Every time someone needed the model to perform a task, they still had to explain the entire process from scratch. The model had access to your

CRM through MCP, but it didn’t remember that your team always filters leads by engagement score first, then checks budget qualification, then routes to the right sales rep based on territory.

MCP gave you connectivity. It didn’t provide you with competency.

That gap is exactly what Claude Skills fills. While MCP says, “here’s how to reach the database,” Skills says, “here’s how we analyze that data, every single time, the way our team needs it done.”

What Makes Claude Skills Different from MCP?

The difference between Claude Skills and MCP comes down to architecture and ownership.

Protocol (MCP): Defines how models connect to external tools. Example: Model Context Protocol or OpenAI Tools. Limitation: requires developer setup. Business impact: reduces integration time but doesn’t scale knowledge.

Capability (Claude Skills): Defines what the model knows how to do. Example: summarize data, build reports, classify text. Limitation: user-driven, reusable. Business impact: democratizes AI deployment across teams.

Claude skipped a step. It built a memory layer for capabilities, which is a system that lets the model learn how to perform a process and recall that behavior on command.

Many people have asked if Skills are like “project folders.” They’re not. A project folder stores files. A Skill stores functionality. A Skill persists task logic, review criteria, and output format, so teams get the same behavior every time in chat, docs, or API use. Think of it as a living playbook that runs anywhere inside your organization’s AI stack. Each Skill captures how your model performs a specific task, remembers it, and reuses it across conversations or applications.

That difference matters. Folders organize work. Skills replicate intelligence.

How Claude Skills Extend the AI Memory Layer

Claude Skills work inside the context window and memory layer of the model. Each Skill defines how the model executes a task, not just what it knows.

In practice, the Skill can call functions or query external data consistently. The model can reuse logic across projects and users. The organization gains a persistent capability layer instead of ephemeral prompts.

MCP solved tool orchestration. Skills solve workflow orchestration. Together, they form a dual stack. Protocol at the bottom, capability at the top.

MCP focuses on connection. Skills focus on execution. The value comes from repeatable behavior, not the transport.

If MCP is the infrastructure layer, Skills are the capability layer that defines how intelligence gets applied.

Real-World Implementation: How Lia’s Flowers Automated Event Planning with Claude Skills

Lia’s Flowers handles dozens of custom events every month, from weddings and baby showers to corporate installations. Each event has different themes, budgets, and seasonal availability. Before Claude Skills, planning was manual, time-consuming, and inconsistent.

The Before State

Our event coordinator spent nearly 10 hours per week building proposals. She cross-referenced past invoices, supplier availability, and client notes to create each order plan. We tracked stem counts, colors, and vase options in spreadsheets. The issue wasn’t creativity. It was repeatability.

Minor errors such as missing seasonal price changes or miscounting stems could erode margins.

Within 24 Hours, We Built an Event Flower Order Planner Using Claude Skills

We created a Skill named “Event Order Planner” and described the process in plain language:

• Ask for event type, date, budget, and color palette
• Use the internal price list to calculate recommended stem counts per arrangement type
• Suggest seasonal substitutions when needed
• Apply a 10% design buffer for breakage and extras
• Output a table with quantity, price, and estimated margin

Claude converted this into a reusable Skill. Every new inquiry runs the same planning logic and returns consistent recommendations.

The After State

• Proposal creation time dropped from 10 hours per week to under 2.
• At an average loaded rate of $150 per hour, that saves $1,200 per week and more than $60,000 per year.
• Inventory forecasting accuracy improved by 18%.
• Event margins improved due to standardized markups and waste buffers.

The Skill adapts in real time. Update the price list or seasonality, and the Skill recalculates across all upcoming events. No manual spreadsheet work.

The team now reuses variants of the Skill for delivery routing and pre-ordering high-volume stems ahead of holiday peaks. One Skill supports quoting, logistics, and inventory forecasting. That compounding reuse is the difference between Skills and traditional automation.

The Competitive Landscape: Where Other Players Stand

OpenAI’s GPTs and custom instructions created specialized instances, but capabilities often remained siloed. Google’s Gemini emphasizes multimodal input and Workspace context. Microsoft Copilot integrates deeply through Microsoft Graph, with trade-offs on customization. Claude Skills sits in the middle—portable, user-definable, and not locked to a single model instance or suite.

Anthropic introduced Skills across chat, code, API, and its agent SDK, standardizing reusable capabilities across contexts.

Claude’s advantage is in the capability architecture itself, but whether that’s enough to drive adoption against entrenched players remains to be seen. The innovative approach is a multi-model strategy. Choose the architecture that solves your problem. Don’t assume a single vendor choice will fit every workflow.

When Skills Create More Complexity Than They Solve

Not every Skill implementation will be a success story.

I’ve seen teams rush to create Skills without thinking through governance, and the result is chaos. One company I advised had 47 different Skills for “summarizing meeting notes” because every department created its own version.

Version control becomes a nightmare quickly. Without proper change management, Skills can break critical workflows with no warning.

Security and compliance risks are real. A Skill that accesses customer data needs the same scrutiny as any other data system.

Skills can also scale dysfunction. If you encode a flawed workflow into a Skill, you’ve automated bad logic.

The common thread in all these failure modes is the same: Skills lower the barrier to AI deployment so dramatically that they can outrun your organizational capacity to govern them. The solution isn’t to avoid Skills.

It’s to build governance frameworks that scale with adoption.

See: AI Governance Framework for Leadership

What Claude Skills Mean for Your Role

For CTOs and Technical Leaders: Skills change your build-versus-buy calculus. In the past, if you wanted consistent AI behavior across your product, you had two options. Build custom models (expensive, slow) or accept inconsistent results from general-purpose models (cheap, unreliable). Skills create a third path: encode your product’s intelligence requirements into reusable capabilities that run on commodity model infrastructure. Your tech stack decision isn’t just “which model provider” anymore. It’s “which capability architecture supports our product roadmap.”

For Operations Leaders: Skills turn operational knowledge into transferable assets. Right now, when your best operations analyst leaves, their expertise walks out the door. Skills let you capture how they think about problems and encode it into systems that outlive individual employees. The question you should be asking is: which operational workflows in my organization are repeatable enough to become Skills, and which require human judgment every time?

For Product Managers: Skills open up entirely new feature possibilities. Instead of building static product features, you can build capability marketplaces where users customize behavior through Skills. Imagine a project management tool where users can create and share their own automation Skills, or a CRM where sales methodologies become installable capability packs. The product isn’t just the interface anymore. It’s the platform for deploying intelligence.

For Individual Contributors: The career implications are significant. The skill that matters isn’t “knowing how to prompt AI.” It’s “knowing how to architect reusable capabilities.” If you can identify patterns in how work gets done and translate those patterns into Skills that others can use, you become exponentially more valuable. Are you building Skills that make you indispensable, or are you letting someone else encode your work into a Skill?

Where AI Capabilities Go Next: The 24-Month Horizon

Skills are version one of something much bigger.

In 12 months, we’ll see Skill marketplaces emerge in two forms: internal libraries where companies curate their own capabilities, and external stores where you can buy pre-built Skills. The valuable ones won’t be generic “summarize text” Skills. They’ll be domain-specific capabilities built by experts: “Analyze SEC filings for M&A signals,” “Score support tickets for churn risk using our methodology,” “Generate compliant marketing copy for financial services.”

In 18 months, Skills will start talking to each other. Right now, a Skill is a self-contained capability. Soon, you’ll be able to chain Skills together into workflows where the output of one becomes the input of another. That’s when we get actual autonomous business processes, not a single AI agent trying to do everything, but a network of specialized capabilities that orchestrate themselves.

In 24 months, the companies that win won’t be the ones with the best AI models. They’ll be the ones with the best Skill libraries. Proprietary data has been the moat of the last decade. Proprietary capabilities will be the next one’s moat.

My bold prediction: by 2027, “Skill Architect” will be a more common job title than “Prompt Engineer.” The work isn’t writing better prompts. It’s designing capability systems that compound in value over time.

The organizations that figure out capability architecture early will have a structural advantage that’s hard to replicate. Because while anyone can buy access to the same AI models, not everyone will have spent two years building and refining a library of Skills that encode their unique way of operating.

How Teams Use Claude Skills to Scale AI Workflows

Claude Skills moves AI from a one-off use case to an enterprise asset. Each Skill becomes a repeatable process that compounds value across your tech stack. Research shows 60% of organizations achieve ROI within 12 months of implementing workflow automation, and Skills accelerates that timeline by removing the technical bottleneck.

Multiple studies report that most organizations achieve automation ROI within 12 months of implementation, and Skills accelerates that timeline by removing technical bottlenecks.

• Embed consistent decision logic in tools without code
• Standardize tone, structure, and compliance across regulated outputs
• Build shared AI function libraries as organizational IP
• Combine Skills into lightweight agents for end-to-end processes

AI becomes infrastructure when teams integrate it, orchestrate it, and trust it. It stops being infrastructure when they treat it as a standalone tool..

Strategic Implications for Leaders

AI Integration Becomes Democratized: Non-technical professionals can now build reusable intelligence without relying on developers. Marketing, operations, and product teams gain more autonomy and speed. The bottleneck shifts from “can we get engineering resources?” to “have we designed the right capability?”

Discovery-to-Deployment Shrinks: With Skills, a proper process no longer sits in documentation. It becomes a callable function in hours, not months. The organization that used to take three months to implement a new AI workflow can now do it in three days. Speed becomes a competitive advantage.

The Next Market: Skill Libraries: Expect an explosion of “Skill Stores” for internal and commercial use, similar to APIs or Notion templates. Owning Skill IP will become as valuable as owning proprietary data. The companies that build the best domain-specific Skills will have an asset they can monetize or use as a competitive moat.

Governance and Trust Will Define Winners: 54% of organizations cite cybersecurity as a primary AI concern, with regulatory compliance worrying 34% of leaders. When every team can build its own Skills, governance becomes critical. Version control, approval flows, and visibility will separate operational excellence from chaos. A 2024 survey showed a 42% gap between expected and actual AI deployments, mainly due to insufficient governance frameworks.

New Organizational Roles Will Emerge: The following AI leadership function isn’t “prompt engineer.” It’s Skill Architect, a role focused on curating, testing, and deploying capabilities across teams. These professionals understand both business processes and AI capabilities well enough to translate between them. They see patterns across departments and extract reusable logic. They govern the Skill library and ensure quality standards. Research shows that 70% of AI implementation challenges stem from people and process issues, not technology, making this human-centered role essential.

Six Quick Wins: Get Started This Week

1. Audit Your Most-Used Prompts: Look at your team’s chat history with Claude or other AI tools. Which prompts get used repeatedly with minor variations? Those are Skill candidates. Start with your top three and formalize them into reusable Skills. Document the time saved and errors prevented to build your business case.
2. Define Ownership for Skill Creation and Review: Decide right now who can create Skills, who approves them, and who maintains them. Without clear ownership, you’ll end up with Skill sprawl and nobody accountable for quality. Even a simple “propose-review-deploy” process is better than free-for-all creation. Establish thresholds for what needs review versus what you can deploy immediately.
3. Create a Pilot Skill Library for Your Top Three Business Functions: Pick three critical business processes (maybe lead qualification, content review, and customer support triage). Build one Skill for each. Document the before-and-after impact with specific metrics: time saved, error reduction, consistency improvements. Use that data to build the case for broader adoption across additional departments.
4. Measure Skill Reuse Rate, Accuracy, and Adoption: Track how many times each Skill gets called, how often the output needs human correction, and how many unique users are leveraging it. These metrics tell you which Skills are delivering value and which need refinement. Build a simple dashboard that makes performance data visible to stakeholders so everyone can see ROI in real-time.
5. Treat Each Skill Like a Micro-Process: Skills need maintenance, not perfection. When business requirements change, Skills need to change too. Schedule quarterly reviews of your Skill library to deprecate outdated ones and update core ones. Think of it like code review, but for capabilities. Version your Skills and document what changed so teams understand the evolution.
6. Link Skills Into Broader AI Workflow Automation Systems: Don’t let Skills exist in isolation. Connect them to your existing automation tools through APIs. A Skill that evaluates customer feedback should trigger actions in your product roadmap tool. A Skill that scores leads should update fields in your CRM. Integration transforms Skills from useful features into a genuine infrastructure that powers your business processes end-to-end.

Conclusion

Claude Skills shift AI from something you use to something you own. Protocols connect systems. Skills create capabilities.

Leaders who understand that difference will shape how AI becomes embedded in their organizations. The question isn’t whether your team will adopt Skills. It’s whether you’ll architect them strategically or accumulate them haphazardly.

The organizations building Skill libraries now are creating competitive moats for the next decade. Because the real value of AI isn’t in the models, it’s in the capabilities you build on top of them.

Claude Skills Frequently Asked Questions

Stay Connected

I share new leadership frameworks and case studies every week. Subscribe to my newsletter below or follow me on LinkedIn and Substack to stay ahead and put structured decision-making into practice.

Related Articles

AI Case Study: How Florists Optimize With Practical AI
AI Marketing Stack Integration: Smarter Attribution, Better ROI
AI Digital Marketing Strategy: Powerful Results MyEListing Achieved
Case Study: High-Trust Teams With Proven Results
Sales Ops Case Study: From Chaos to Repeatable Growth
MyEListing Growth Experimentation Case Study: Driving Real Results

About the Author

I write about:

• AI + MarTech Automation
• AI Strategy
• COO Ops & Systems
• Growth Strategy (B2B & B2C)
• Infographic
• Leadership & Team Building
• My Case Studies
• Personal Journey
• Revenue Operations (RevOps)
• Sales Strategy
• SEO & Digital Marketing
• Strategic Thinking

📩 Want 1:1 strategic support? 
🔗 Connect with me on LinkedIn
📬 Read my playbooks on Substack